Comments on: Clarifying C++ negation http://www.thunderguy.com/semicolon/2000/12/09/clarifying-c-negation/ Software, the Internet and you. Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:27:55 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Bennett http://www.thunderguy.com/semicolon/2000/12/09/clarifying-c-negation/#comment-944 Bennett Thu, 30 Mar 2006 02:41:32 +0000 http://www.thunderguy.com/plusplus/20050421/clarifying-c-negation/#comment-944 It fits right in with current style of writing on the web: OMG!!! LOL!!!!!! It fits right in with current style of writing on the web: OMG!!! LOL!!!!!!

]]> By: Simon http://www.thunderguy.com/semicolon/2000/12/09/clarifying-c-negation/#comment-943 Simon Thu, 30 Mar 2006 02:32:55 +0000 http://www.thunderguy.com/plusplus/20050421/clarifying-c-negation/#comment-943 if (!!!limited) {...} You're joking right? My eyes hurt just looking at all those exclamation marks. if (!!!limited) {…}

You’re joking right? My eyes hurt just looking at all those exclamation marks.

]]> By: Prefer prefix operators over postfix » thunderguy++ http://www.thunderguy.com/semicolon/2000/12/09/clarifying-c-negation/#comment-2 Prefer prefix operators over postfix » thunderguy++ Thu, 21 Apr 2005 23:18:16 +0000 http://www.thunderguy.com/plusplus/20050421/clarifying-c-negation/#comment-2 [...] l for clarity and visibility in code, I recommend prefix operators over postfix. (See also Clarifying C++ negation.) [...] [...] l for clarity and visibility in code, I recommend prefix operators over postfix. (See also Clarifying C++ negation.) [...]

]]>