<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Java stack trace with line numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thunderguy.com/semicolon/2004/02/11/java-stack-trace-with-line-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thunderguy.com/semicolon/2004/02/11/java-stack-trace-with-line-numbers/</link>
	<description>Software, the Internet and you.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dale Swift</title>
		<link>http://www.thunderguy.com/semicolon/2004/02/11/java-stack-trace-with-line-numbers/#comment-4846</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Swift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thunderguy.com/plusplus/20050421/16/#comment-4846</guid>
		<description>The downside of this is that the JIT compiler also performs code optimisation. I've found some code will run 10 to 20 times slower with the JIT compiler disabled. So, this technique is fine for debugging, but not for production code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The downside of this is that the JIT compiler also performs code optimisation. I&#8217;ve found some code will run 10 to 20 times slower with the JIT compiler disabled. So, this technique is fine for debugging, but not for production code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
